The dialogue between Buddhism and Christianity has not gone
very far, in my opinion, because we have not been able to set up a solid ground
for such dialogue. This is a reflection of the present situation.
Buddhists believe in reincarnation, the possibility for
human beings to live several lives. In Buddhist circles, we do not use the word
incarnation very much: we use the word rebirth. After you die, you can be
reborn and can have another life. In Christianity, your life is unique, your
only chance for salvation. If you spoil it, then you will never get salvation.
You have only one life.
Buddhism teaches that there is non-self, anatta.
Christianity clearly teaches that a Christian is a personalist. Not only are
you a person, self, but God is a person, and He has a self. The Buddhist
teaching of emptiness and no substance sounds like the teaching of no being.
Christianity speaks of being, of existence. The teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas
speaks of the philosophy of being, la philisophie de l'etre, the confirmation
that the world is.
There is compassion and loving-kindness in Buddhism, which
many Christians believe to be different from the charity and love in
Christianity. Charity has two aspects: your love directed to God, and your love
directed to humankind. You have to learn how to love your enemy. Our Christian
friends have a tendency to remind us that the motivation of love is different
for Christians and Buddhists. There are theologians who say that Buddhists
practice compassion just because they want liberation; that Buddhists don't
really care about the suffering of people and other living beings; that they
are only motivated by the desire to be liberated. In Christianity, your love is
grounded in God. You love God, and because God said that you must love your
neighbor, so you love your neighbor. Your love of your neighbor springs from
the ground of your love of God.
Many people, especially in Christian circles, say that there
are things in common between Christianity and Buddhism. But many find that the
philosophical foundations of Christianity and Buddhism are quite different.
Buddhism teaches rebirth, many lives. Christianity teaches that only this one
life is available to you. Buddhism teaches that there is no self, but in
Christianity there is a real self. Buddhism teaches emptiness, no substance,
while Christianity confirms the fact of existence.
If the philosophical ground is so different, the practice of
compassion and loving kindness in Buddhism and of charity and love in
Christianity is different. All that seems to be a very superficial way of
seeing. If we have time and if we practice our own tradition well enough and
deeply enough, we will see that these issues are not real.
First of all, there are many forms of Buddhism, many ways of
understanding Buddhism. If you have one hundred people practicing Buddhism, you
may have one hundred forms of Buddhism. The same is true in Christianity. If
there are one hundred thousand people practicing Christianity, there may be one
hundred thousand ways of understanding Christianity.
In Plum Village, where many people from different religious
backgrounds come to practice, it is not difficult to see that sometimes a
Buddhist recognizes a Christian as being more Buddhist than another Buddhist. I
see a Buddhist, but the way he understands Buddhism is quite different from the
way I do. However, when I look at a Christian, I see that the way he
understands Christianity and practices love and charity is closer to the way I
practice them than this man who is called a Buddhist. The same thing is true in
Christianity. From time to time, you feel that you are very far away from your
Christian brother. You feel that the brother who practices in the Buddhist
tradition is much closer to you as a Christian. So Buddhism is not Buddhism and
Christianity is not Christianity. There are many forms of Buddhism and many
ways of understanding Buddhism. There are many ways of understanding
Christianity. Therefore, let us forget the idea that Christianity must be like
this, and that Buddhism can only be like that.
We don't want to say that Buddhism is a kind of Christianity
and Christianity is a kind of Buddhism. A mango can not be an orange. I cannot
accept the fact that a mango is an orange. They are two different things. Vive
la difference. But when you look deeply into the mango and into the orange, you
see that although they are different they are both fruits. If you analyze the
mango and the orange deeply enough, you will see small elements are in both,
like the sunshine, the clouds, the sugar, and the acid. If you spend time
looking deeply enough, you will discover that the only difference between them
lies in the degree, in the emphasis. At first you see the difference between
the orange and the mango. But if you look a little deeper, you discover many
things in common. In the orange you find acid and sugar which is in the mango
too. Even two oranges taste different; one can be very sour and one can be very
sweet.
- From "Going Home: Jesus and Buddha as Brothers"
by Thich Nhat Hanh
Via : E-buddhism